"Tapp" into the Truth
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Past Broadcasts
  • Sponsors & Friends
  • Support Tapp into the Truth

"Tapp" into the Truth

Thoughts on the issues, or just what's on my mind.

"Tapp" into the Truth on Tumblr AKA Off Topic

HASN’T THE GOVERNMENT DONE ENOUGH FOR ELON MUSK? APPARENTLY, NOT.

5/26/2019

0 Comments

 
Elon Musk may very well be one of the largest beneficiaries of America’s generous system of corporate subsidization. Between his two companies—SpaceX and Tesla--Musk has received nearly $9 billion in taxpayer-funded federal subsidies. And that doesn’t even take into account the billions of dollars provided in the form of government contracts. All in all, the United States government has invested far more money into SpaceX and Tesla than Elon Musk ever could, and his businesses are all the better for it. But are his results any better for it? 
 
One might suspect that the federal government has done more than enough to ensure Musk’s success. (Talk about picking winners and losers.) You would be forgiven for expecting Musk to at least be grateful for all those American taxpayer dollars given to him. A few people might even hope that Musk would begin the process of transitioning away from federal subsidization and move toward market profitability as most businesses must in order to survive. But that few would be sorely mistaken. Elon’s appetite for federal dollars is more voracious than ever, and he has shown he will go to great lengths to get what he wants, even if that means suing the government itself. (After all, a taxpayer dollar given is an investment dollar Elon didn’t have to procure. And private-sector expectations of return on investment is considerably different than that of the government.) 
 
On May 17, SpaceX, Musk’s private aerospace company, filed a lawsuit against the federal government, protesting their contract bidding process. Details surrounding the litigation are difficult to come by since SpaceX requested that any information regarding the suit be kept private. Nevertheless, journalists have pointed out that the lawsuit coincides with a government aerospace program called the Launch Service Agreement (LSA). And given that the United States Air Force is currently moving forward with contract bids for the LSA project, the Launch Service Agreement’s bidding process is almost certainly the subject of the lawsuit.  
 
But why would Musk decide to sue the federal government over an ongoing project like the Launch Service Agreement? It certainly would appear that it’s because Musk feels entitled to the federal dollars the program provides. In October 2018, despite being the odds-on favorite to be awarded an LSA contract, SpaceX was not selected to participate in the program’s initial phase. SpaceX – in true “give me what I want” style - decried the decision and lobbied Congress to alter the Air Force’s selection—to little success. Its previous attempts having proved unfruitful, SpaceX is apparently redoubling its efforts to remain on the federal government’s dole. 
 
Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time Musk has sued the federal government to get what he wants. SpaceX has filed numerous lawsuits against the United States in the past. Most recently, Musk initiated a separate 2019 suit protesting NASA’s decision to award a $150 million contract to the company’s foremost competitor. Within the official protest, Musk asserted that SpaceX deserved to be chosen because – according to Musk - it was the superior option.  
 
However, the argument for SpaceX’s superiority is becoming harder to make as the company is struggling to perform. Recently, Musk’s aerospace firm suffered a catastrophic setback when its Crew Dragon shuttle exploded during testing. The mishap spooked both the U.S. military and NASA, creating the potential for serious delays of America’s crewed spaceflight to the moon. That severe failure, coupled with the Crew Dragon’s inadequate parachute testing results, have raised serious concerns about SpaceX’s viability as an aerospace contractor moving forward.  
 
SpaceX’s performance regarding the Launch Service Agreement was no better. When discussing SpaceX’s LSA bid, Musk openly admitted that his company missed the mark by presenting a subpar proposal. According to Musk himself, SpaceX was not selected to receive an LSA contract because its performance wasn’t up to snuff. But did that deter SpaceX from suing? Of course not. Musk’s desire to secure federal funding was apparently too strong to do anything but fight for money that his company doesn’t deserve.  
 
Despite Musk’s purported hunger for government contracts and subsidies, the American taxpayer owes him nothing. The United States has already provided Musk’s companies with ample funding. But it seems like Musk’s aerospace firm, in particular, is determined to squander the opportunities and good will it was given. By attempting to force itself into the Launch Service Agreement, SpaceX is only highlighting its worst qualities: a penchant towards entitlement in the face of failure and unwavering reliance on federal money. Neither of which do a reliable government contractor make.  ​
0 Comments

Teenagers Attacking People with Hammers

5/24/2019

0 Comments

 
What would you say if I told you that there was a roaming gang of teenagers attacking people – with hammers - in Minneapolis near the East Bank Light Rail station last Friday (May 17th 2019)? What would you say if I told you that the victims of those attacks were – according to a witness – people who “looked like they had money or were white”? Would you be surprised? Would you ask why you haven’t heard about it on CNN or any number of other national “news” outlets? What if I then told you that this gang of eight to ten teens were Somali? Would that raise more questions for you, or would it answer questions for you? 
    My first question would be “Why is a group of eight to ten teenagers attacking people with hammers and other blunt objects at a train station so close to the University of Minnesota not dominating the current news cycle?” The answer is of course “Protect the narrative.” Sadly, we live in an age where most media outlets are more concerned with doing their part in the grand social engineering project than they are with actually informing you. So, protect the narrative. 
   The next question would be “Was this racially motivated?” The answer – protect the narrative. We have been told by the race hustlers and the MSM that only white, conservatives can be racist. We have been told that only “institutional racism” is real racism thereby allowing people on the left to ignore the actual definition of the word racism while they insist on using the word to silence or demonize those who might disagree with them on some socio-political topic. The account of the witness who said that they seemed to be “attacking anyone who looked like they had money or were white” sure sounds like race was a factor; but asking the question opens the door to challenging the narrative. 
   My next question would be “Why should the fact that these teenagers are Somali effect news coverage?” The answer - protect the narrative. Many Americans have been asking for immigration and asylum reforms and enforcement, but we have been told by politicians – and the media – that everything is fine. There isn’t anything wrong with how things are being done now unless you’re racist and in that case everyone else should ignore you. If the media were to cover this story it might raise questions about the need for reforms, some people might try to use this story to promote the idea of stricter enforcement of current laws. Talking about violent and or criminal immigrants or refugees opens the door to challenging the narrative. 
   Rep. Ilhan Omar, who herself is a refugee from Somali, represents this district which is sometimes referred to as Little Mogadishu. Omar has been caught-up in controversies involving anti-Semitic statements, siding with terrorist warlords in regard to the 1993 Mogadishu raid that most Americans know from Black Hawk Down fame, and even called the 9/11 attacks an event where “some people did something.” Omar seems the perfect choice to represent Little Mogadishu and such an attack on random travelers seems more in line with Mogadishu than with an American city like Minneapolis; leading to my next questions “Is this a cultural issue?” and “Has Ilhan Omar’s statements – without any consequences from her fellow Democrats – further emboldened people like these teens to act in this fashion?” But we have been told that all cultures are of equal value and that diversity for the sake of diversity is of greater value than our cultural norms (like following the law, not randomly attacking people on the street, etc.). Asking these questions opens the door to challenging the narrative.    
   The MSM has a vested interest in protecting the narrative at this point because of how long that they have been peddling the talking points of the leftist agenda. There are so many different parts of the narrative that are exposed to scrutiny in this one news story. Reporting on this one might lead to the few people left that still trust them to begin questioning the trustworthiness of the mainstream media that has been telling everyone for so long that there is nothing to worry about. The only option to protect the narrative is too ignore this one … at least until they figure out how to spin it.  
Hat tips to Elizabeth Vaughn of Red State, Matt Vespa of Townhall, Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit, and Alpha News MN for their part in doing the job that the rest of the media won’t do. (Here is the Minneapolis Police Department dispatch audio.) ​
0 Comments

    Author Tim Tapp

    Conservitive, Author, and Host of "Tapp" into the Truth

    Archives

    January 2025
    June 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    November 2022
    August 2022
    June 2022
    January 2022
    October 2021
    August 2021
    April 2021
    October 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    August 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2017
    August 2016
    April 2016
    September 2015
    January 2015
    September 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013

    Categories

    All
    Ahmed Mohamed
    Department Of Veterans Affairs
    Islam
    Kafir
    Kim Davis
    Same-sex Marriage
    Scotus
    Sharia Law
    States Rights
    Taqiyya
    Veterans

    RSS Feed

Web Hosting by iPage